Honest comparison

Alternative to anewSpring?

Considering anewSpring? That is a logical candidate: anewSpring is a cloud LMS from Rotterdam (since 2003, approx. 50-200 employees) that focuses specifically on commercial training providers, combining authoring, LMS, LXP and e-commerce in one SaaS platform. Its hallmarks are blended learning journeys, adaptive learning and the MemoTrainer (spaced repetition); as of 2025-2026, 700+ organisations use the platform, mainly in the Netherlands and Belgium. With 4.8/5 overall on GetApp/Capterra and a 4.9/5 customer-support score, its reviews are excellent.

Still, no single platform fits everyone. Below we compare anewSpring honestly with Moodle plus custom development — including the aspects where anewSpring wins.

Book a no-obligation call Or ask your question via the contact form

When is anewSpring the right choice?

Are you a Dutch or Belgian training company or education provider that sells courses commercially, wants to go live quickly without in-house IT or a development budget, and wants out-of-the-box e-commerce, adaptive blended journeys, MemoTrainer and a PE-online connection? With a few hundred to a few thousand participants per year and no need for deep system integrations or platform ownership, anewSpring is honestly the more logical and cheaper choice than Moodle + custom development.

Where anewSpring is strong

Purpose-built for commercial training providers: course catalogue, self-enrollment and e-commerce with payment integrations (Stripe, Buckaroo, PayPal) are standard in the platform
Adaptive learning and MemoTrainer spaced repetition are built in — functionality most LMSs lack or that requires custom development
Built-in authoring with 8 interactive question types and 15+ learning activities, plus (certified) SCORM import for existing content
Very high review scores: 4.8/5 overall on GetApp/Capterra, customer support 4.9/5; reviewers praise the helpful Dutch support
EU hosting in ISO 27001/9001-certified datacenters, GDPR-compliant, daily backups
Dutch vendor with NL-specific connections such as PE-online for accreditation points — relevant for healthcare and professional training providers

Points to consider with anewSpring

Per-participant pricing model: costs grow linearly with the number of learners; the organisation plan's price is not public and only available on quote
Closed SaaS: no self-hosted option and no code-level changes; customization is limited to configuration, templates and branding within the platform
API integrations, SSO, custom reports, unlimited backend users and phone support are not in the entry plan but only in the (more expensive) organisation plan
Capterra reviewers mention a learning curve ('it can do a lot, but it is hard to grasp all the possibilities') and that content items cannot be moved between content libraries — the library structure needs to be thought through upfront
Bulk changes with a large participant base are experienced as cumbersome by reviewers; the platform is primarily designed for external training providers, not internal corporate academies (the vendor positions it that way itself)

How anewSpring's pricing works

anewSpring uses a per-participant licence model: a licence is deducted per participant per year. The vendor-published trainer plan costs EUR 18.60 per participant per year, with no fixed annual fee (indicative, 2025-2026 price level; older sources mention EUR 17.50-18). The organisation plan — with API, SSO, custom reports, unlimited backend users and phone support — has no published price; quote-only after a demo. Costs therefore scale linearly with the number of participants. All amounts indicative.

anewSpring next to Moodle with custom development

For each aspect we honestly mark which option is usually strongest — including where anewSpring wins. Where no marker is shown, the outcome depends on your situation.

Scroll horizontally to see the full table

Aspect	anewSpring	Moodle + custom work
Pricing model	EUR 18.60 per participant/year (trainer plan, indicative); organisation plan quote-only — costs scale with participant count	No licence costs; one-off custom development/implementation + hosting and maintenance, flat at any participant count
Hosting & data location	SaaS in EU datacenters (ISO 27001/9001), no choice of location or self-hosting	Completely free choice: Dutch datacenter, own servers or cloud; direct database access Strongest option for this aspect
Customization	Configuration, templates and branding within the platform; no code changes possible	Open source: own plugins, themes and functionality at code level, unlimited Strongest option for this aspect
Integrations	API, webhooks, SAML SSO (Azure AD/ADFS), Stripe/Buckaroo/PayPal, PE-online — API/SSO only in the organisation plan	Web services API, LTI, ~2,000 plugins; any integration (HR/CRM/planning) can be built as custom work
Content authoring	Built-in authoring with 8 question types, 15+ activities, adaptive journeys and MemoTrainer Strongest option for this aspect	Ample standard activities + H5P; adaptive learning and spaced repetition require plugins/custom work
SCORM/xAPI	SCORM-certified import as an activity; SCORM/AICC/xAPI reporting supported	SCORM 1.2 native; xAPI/cmi5 via plugins and an external LRS
Reporting	Standard dashboards; custom reports and reporting engine reserved for the organisation plan	Built-in Report Builder, plus unlimited custom reports with direct database access
Vendor lock-in & exit	Closed SaaS; imported SCORM packages reusable, but natively authored content has no published SCORM export — exit requires rebuilding	Open source: full course backups (MBZ), database export, free to switch partner Strongest option for this aspect
Implementation effort	SaaS with online onboarding; live within days, free trial Strongest option for this aspect	Setup, hosting and configuration via a partner; lead time weeks to months depending on custom scope
Support model	Email support standard; CSM, phone support and elevated SLA in the organisation plan; support rated 4.9/5	Community + SLA via your development partner; quality depends on the chosen partner
Compliance & healthcare (accreditation)	PE-online connection for accreditation points, certificates with online register, GDPR/EU hosting out of the box	Certificate plugins standard; PE-online or quality-register connection as custom work; full GDPR control when self-hosting
Cost scalability	Per-participant licences: 10x more learners means ~10x higher licence costs	Only infrastructure scales; no per-user fee — structurally cheaper at large volumes Strongest option for this aspect

Why organisations still choose Moodle with custom development

No per-participant licence costs: Moodle is GPL open source — you pay for hosting and (custom) development, and costs stay flat at 5,000 or 50,000 learners, where per-participant SaaS grows linearly

Unlimited code-level customization: your own plugins, themes, workflows and integrations — anything an organisation needs can be built instead of waiting for the vendor's roadmap

Full data sovereignty: you choose the hosting location (own datacenter or Dutch cloud), have direct database access and full control over GDPR setup and retention periods

No vendor lock-in: open source with standardised course backups (MBZ), thousands of partners worldwide — you can always switch hosting or development partner without losing the platform

Huge ecosystem: ~2,000 plugins in the Moodle plugin directory, native SCORM, LTI, web services API — integrations with HR, CRM or planning systems can be realised without limits

Ownership: the environment is yours; the platform keeps running and can keep evolving, independent of the survival or pricing policy of a single vendor

Honest caveats about Moodle with custom development

Higher barrier to entry: implementation, hosting and custom development require a partner or in-house expertise and an upfront investment (typically EUR 5k-100k), where anewSpring as SaaS is live almost immediately
Adaptive learning, spaced repetition (a MemoTrainer equivalent) and course e-commerce are not standard in Moodle — that requires plugins or custom development, while anewSpring delivers this out of the box
You are responsible (with your partner) for updates, security and administration; there is no central vendor with a single SLA for the whole platform unless you contract one

Switching from anewSpring to Moodle

SCORM packages created with an external authoring tool (e.g. iSpring, Articulate) and uploaded to anewSpring are directly reusable in Moodle's native SCORM player. Content authored inside anewSpring (lessons, question sets, adaptive journeys, MemoTrainer items) is platform-specific: the knowledge base documents SCORM import and content import/export within the platform, but no SCORM/xAPI export of natively authored courses — so plan on rebuilding that content in Moodle (or H5P).

Participant and result data can be retrieved via the anewSpring API and report exports (CSV) and imported via Moodle's user upload/web services; historical progress does not migrate 1-to-1. Certificate templates, the PE-online connection and payment flows need to be set up again in Moodle (custom work or plugins).

Plan the switch around the expiry of the annual participant licences to avoid double costs.

Weighing anewSpring against Moodle with custom development?

In a free 30-minute call we will honestly think along about what fits your organisation — even if the outcome is that anewSpring is the better choice for you.

Book a no-obligation call Or ask your question via the contact form

Other comparisons

Comparing more LMS and e-learning platforms? Also see:

Alternative to iSpring Learn

Alternative to Pluvo

Alternative to TalentLMS

Alternative to Easygenerator

Comparison compiled in July 2026. Prices are indicative; always verify current pricing and terms with the vendor. Brand names are the property of their respective owners. Ldesign Media is not affiliated with anewSpring.

Sources